In Brazil, Corn and Soybeans are now sub-products of FX

In Brazil, Corn and Soybeans are now sub-products of FX

I have been sending out regular updates to subscribers
on the current pricing dynamic in Brazil.

I have been pounding the table about FX for months.

The underlying theme has been when USD:BRL gets above
4:1, Chicago becomes less and less important as a hedging tool
and price discovery mechanism within Brazil.

I sense the North American producer is not grasping this
and its importance. As long as MFP 3.0 comes, one can
continue to ignore this South American phenomenon.

I must admit, I too am surprised that we are trading
above 4.32:1. We hit 4.67 on Friday. 
There is more talk of 4.80-5.0 in the coming months.
What I have experienced in the past is that when these forecasts
come in, either to an extreme high or low, they tend
not to quite make the projection.

With the BRL, there is never anyone that forecasts that the
new trend i.e. 4:1 to 4.67, but when the break out comes,
everyone sees it going to 5:1. This is called bullshit.

In January, when FX was 4:1, the projections by major banks
were for 3.80:1 for the year. When we broke out of the 4.32:1 
Nov 2019 high, then the forecasts flipped to how high we can go. 

To the chagrin of many, the Brazilian economy is quite stable.
Low inflation, low interest rates, and an admin that has and still
wants to cut spending. The Brazilian GDP has been cut from 2.5%
to 1.5% for 2020 because of Corona, but even so, this is quite
stable. It looks like Brazil will cut the Selic rate to 4% soon.

The Brazilian farmer is selling his crop quickly and getting 2021
sold too. Soybean prices in Mato Grosso are trading at the highest
level since July 2016(the drought year). Meanwhile, Chicago soybeans
are trading near contract lows. Corn prices in Mato Grosso feel like
US$ 7.00 per bu in Chicago. 

When we talk about sub-products with soybeans and corn, we
tend to think of ethanol, DDGs, corn syrup, soybean oil and meal.

The value of soybeans and corn in Chicago are derived from what
the sub-products are worth on the global stage.

In Brazil, when FX is at 4.60, we can start to think of corn and soybeans
as sub-products of the USD FX. 

If the Corona virus wanes and economic activity picks up and the Dollar
declines, we can get back to normal.
However, if we do trade up to 5:1 on a USA/Global meltdown, the
Brazilian farmer need not even look at a Chicago quote screen.

It will not matter. FX is the driver- not supply and demand. 

The Brazilian farmer and USA farmer live in two different worlds
at the moment.

The Brazilian farmer sees a bull market and is preparing for 2021
and 2022 accordingly i.e. expansion of production. 

The USA farmer sees a bear market and is preparing accordingly i.e
crop insurance revenue protection, PLC/ARC payments, and potential
for MFP 3.0. In other words, producing for below the cost of production
unless max yield is achieved. This reminds me of the LDP mindset of the
90s. 

Lots of interest in RUMO these days. Railroad expansion and who will
get the Ferrograo concession scheduled for June. 

For those paying attention, now is the time to send money to Brazil.

Drop me a note if any questions.

agturbobrazil@yahoo.com

Happy Easter

Kory

Happy New Year

The start of the 2020 growing season has been one
of below normal rainfall. Rains are now more general at
the start of 2020.

Mato Grosso has a record soybean crop on deck. Given
all the attention to the Amazon back in August, I must
ask myself where the media is today?

France offers to help Brazil back in August and the
aid is declined. Today, Brazil offers to help Australia.

Bottom line to all of this: In August, that is the burning
season for Brazil. Australia is on fire in December, and
it is not the burning season. It seems to me that is the
story and not the former.

Flip side: Is burning and clearing increasing in Brazil?  Yes

It looks like 10,000 square KM were cleared in 2019.
I am not surprised by this as I predicted this in the August newsletters.
But, to keep things in perspective, back in 2004, the clearing rate
was 24,000 sq Km. So, even though we have seen an increase in
clearing, we are still at 40% of the previous peak. That was happening
before social media was so passionate or should I say fickle?

I still say the bigger story is what has happened since 2004.
24,000 sq KM or 10,000 square miles were opened in one year.
That is 277 townships. Today, those 277 townships all have
70 bu beans on them.

We have had some problems in RGDS, Bahia, and Piaui. There has
been some loss in 1st crop corn and need for replanting of soybeans
in the Northeast. It will take time to see how this plays out.

Brazil economy looks to be starting out on a firm note. 2.3%
growth for the year ahead is the projection so far.

The price of beef is at record highs.

Old crop corn prices are very firm. Brisk export pace and
increasing domestic demand combined with a shrinking first
crop has created some fear in the market.

Look for imports of corn from ARG and USA in coming months.

FX has stablized for the time being after peaking in late November
at 4.27:1. This gets the animal spirits flowing in AG.

Mato Grosso's 3rd 100% corn only ethanol mill will come
online in late January. This mill will be 210 million gallon
capacity when complete. It is huge.

Looking forward, April rains will determine how Brazil
shakes out this year for soy, corn, and cotton.

Will Brazil produce 120 mmt of soy or a 125 mmt?

Will Brazil produce 85 mmt of corn or 100 mmt?

Even with expanded cotton area, will Brazil be able
to repeat the 2019 record productivity in cotton?

The BR 163 highway is complete to Mirituba, Para.
This is along the Tapajos River where barges can be loaded
and transfered to ports at Belem.
Trucks will be zipping north during soybean harvest.
We can now measure turn around time in hours and days,
compared to the last few years, when trucks would disappear for
weeks and even months at a time into the jungle.
I look for these northern ports to increase volumes from about 6 million
tons in 2019 to possibly 10 mmt or more in 2020.
Freight rates have dropped from US$ 60 per ton to ship north in 2019
to US$ 40 per ton in 2020. This is a game changer.

I have increased the price of my newsletter to US$ 600 per year.

VIP light with consult time and special send outs are now US$ 3250 per year.

VIP professional level remains at US$ 6000 per year.

Drop me a note at agturbobrazil@yahoo.com for more info.

www.brazilintl.com

Keywords: Amazon, soybeans, corn, freight rates, Brazil production,
                   deforestation rates, historical comparison

Oct 20th blog update

It has been awhile since a blog update.

I have been focusing on the newsletters.

Soybean planting has been closer to the 5/6 year average
pace. Compared to last year, it seems late.

Western Parana is the area of concern again.
Much unplanted and many will be replating
due to hot dry weather.
Any replanting areas will not have a chance for
2nd crop corn. It will be planted in March 2020 and
it will not be viable.

BR Corn prices have spiked in the last two weeks.
The market is sensing it will not have the extra
tons to ship willy nilly in 2020.

Domestic corn demand continues to rise with
increased corn ethanol production, increased
pork and chicken production too. China
has been buying pork, chicken and a fair amount
of 2020 soybeans too.

Port bids for new crop soy have tanked which makes
Brazil new crop soybeans cheaper than USA at the moment.

I think Brazil can still produce a decent soybean crop,
but the total corn production will drop in 2020.
We will not be producing 100 mmt of corn.

Rain is in forecast for Goiania for Monday. It has been
95 and clear skies most of the time. We have had two shots
of rain and they were light. After this rain chance,
it is to turn hot and dry again into November. That is
when the good rains are set to come. Very late indeed.

Back home in NW Minnesota is a battle. Record amounts
of rain for Sept and Oct. Some areas getting 15 inches in
a little over a month. Big rains are not unheard of, but to
get rains like this in late Fall, that is strange.

Many have bought tracks for combines. Several have
tracks on combines year round from previous experience.
Soybean basis has narrowed to minus 1.18 under Chicago
which is actually quite good. Last year at this time, we were
circa - 2.50 under CME.

We have a decent soybean crop, but it is hard to know how much will
get harvested. Ideally, the ground would freeze into November and go on
the frost. But if it snows, they are screwed. If it freezes, that means
no tillage, and that creates new problems for 2020.
Minimal fertilizer sales, seed sales, and much talk of pre-vent
plant for 2020. Without a significant rally in Chicago, the
attitude will be to say screw it.

I can only imagine what bankers are thinking. Many operations
were on thin ice last winter, I can only imagine what the discussions
will be this winter.

This is the problem with precision ag, when it works and conditons
are nice, it sure can produce a nice crop with all the passes.
But, when conditions turn sour, what good are GPS, globes and
high tech screens when one is just trying to stay afloat, much
less, stay straight. Do the micro nutrient passes and fungcides
matter when the crop is covered in snow?

It does make you wonder?

I know I sound like a pessimistic party pooper, but I am looking
at those who are in survival mode verses those who spend for
top yeilds all the time. Who will be right?

I have told many tour groups that have come to Brazil.
All the technology that is being developed from GPS, high
speed planters and prescription farming plans are all great,
but we will see a time where we cannot afford this in USA
on 80 acre tracts here and there and all this stuff will be applied
down here on the 5000 to 10,000 hectare blocks of land where
they produce 2 or 3 crops per year consistantly.

I know it is a tough pill to swallow. I do not like making
the statement. But, I fear it is closer to reality that we
realize.

We seem to have some sort of trade deal on the horizon.
Great

The 50 billion number makes a guy wonder.
I doubt the Chinese will damage the Brazil relationship.
I think USA will go back to a normalized soybean run of
30 mmts and Brazil will stay at 40 mmt+ for the near future.

The surprise might come from a corn, wheat, ethanol, DDG's,
lumber, or cotton mega purchase from USA.
The bull market is likely sleeping yet in some other
commodity outside of soybeans.

I will continue to update subscribers in Real time.

Thanks for all the 2020 renewals.

Much appreicated

Kory

Aug 24th Amazon fires, media distortion, and unintended consequences

My Brazil experience is now coming up on 20 years. Much of that time in
Mato Grosso and the transitional rain forest.

I am not an environmental expert. However, I am more of an expert
than many on twitter this past week. When I saw images of elephants,
kangaroos, and koalas in the Amazon, I knew the media had gone too far.

I think Taylor Swift has it right:
"You need to calm down, you're being too loud
And I'm just like oh-oh, oh-oh, oh-oh, oh-oh, oh-oh (oh)
You need to just stop"

I wish some of the movie stars that are so concerned about the

Amazon would come down for a tour. I would love to educate them. 

I watched Bill Maher this morning. I like him. I do not always

agree with him, but I like his style. Friday night he too showed

his ignorance about Brazil. He showed the common white man

tendendency to look at Brazil as a colony.

"Someone should just buy the Amazon" Someone like George Soros.

This made me angry and I am a fake Brazilian. I am a guest here. 

Brazil has been colonized for centuries by Spain, England, and

Portugal. Brazil has had their resources stolen time and time again.

Here is a newsflash. THE AMAZON IS NOT FOR SALE.

The Amazon is Brazil's.  Period !!!!

If you do not undertsand this, go back and read Brazil's

history. They have a right to be Xenaphobic about this.

Obviously the Amazon is important to the whole world.

However, the northern hemisphere countries are trying to

dictate to Brazil how the Amazon should be preserved.

I would suggest the following, instead of trying to tell

Brazil what to do and criticize them, they should offer

an open invitation. "Hey Brazil, if you need some

help with enforcement or resources, give us a call"

Do not tell BRAZIL what they should be doing. 

I wrote in my July 2018 newsletter on how the trade

war is likely to cause unintended consequences in the

market place and where crops are grown.

I wrote in my June 2019 newsletter about how new lands

are being cleared in northern Mato Grosso. An example

was 5000 ha of forest was purchased and now 1000 ha was

being opened for rice production. Soybeans will come

later. 

After the updated forest code of 2012 that made clearing

of forest more restrictive and required 80% of the area

be left as permanent reserve and 20% for crops, the

clearing of land has been very subdued. In my opinion,

the new forest code was too restrictive. 

The 80/20 line is north of 13 deg S latitude.

The new administration pulled the environmental oversight

officials out of many Amazon locations. This agency is

known as Ibama and they send out fines and impound

soy grown on illegally deforested tracts. 

I can give an example of a producers frustration with

the system. I know an American who cleared land

in NE MT back in early 2000s. He then sold the land

to a Brazilian in about 2014. After he sold it, he found out

that a tract of the farm was impounded because he cleared

it after a specific date even though he had license to clear it. 

The fine then starts going back to beginning with fees and

surcharges. A small fine can quickly become millions

of Reais. He paid the fine and assumed all was good.

Example would be, you get a speeding ticket, pay the fine,

and you are good to go. 

In this case, you need to re-record that your land is free and

clear. He did not know that. He then got another new fine.

Also, he is unable to complete the contract for deed sale of 

the land which until today remains unsettled. 

This is the kind of nonsense that Bolsonaro and his

admin are trying to help producers with. Solve the old

problems on the books so farmers can move forward. 

Unintended consequences

In 2018 we have a USA/China trade war.

China responds with new tariffs on USA ag

products.

China looks to South America to fill in their

soybean needs. The port premium goes to

US$ 2.50 over Chicago futures in Sept at the

same time the FX BRL goes to 4.20:1 because

of the Brazilian election. It was the best of

times for Br farmer. Due to the lateness of the

boom, he was unable to increase soybean area

to the level the domestic market was telling him to.

So here we are a year later, BRL is back to 4:1,

we have soybean prices making new highs in Brazil,

soybean port premiums are + 1.50 USD over Chicago

and we are surprised by some smoke in the Amazon?

Come on- get a clue or atleast buy my newsletters

so you know what is going on.

I am pleasantly surprised there is not a lot more

smoke in the Amazon. This is normal.

It is August, it is burning season.

The rains come in less than three weeks, if you 

are going to burn, you need to do it now !!!!!

It is too wet the rest of the year !!!!

Back in 2003-2005, now that was smoke.

We are probably 10-15% of peak burning 

like that of the early 2000s. What is the major

difference?  We did not have any social

media back then !!!

Solutions

Over the years I have heard a common theme

among farmers as to how to solve this.

Basically this would be a Brazilian CRP program

for the reserve areas. This would incentivize the

Brazilian land owner to self monitor. 

For those who do not know what CRP is in USA,

it was the conservation reserve program that started

in 1986. It took highly erodible and wetlands out

of production for periods of up to 10 to 15 years at a time.

It was started to help bail out the banks and broke

farmers from the 80's. It morphed into a farmer

retirement program. It later morphed into a fixed

income investment for small and medium size

investors that could get  4-6% ROI from the 

government. The investor would buy the land 

and the contract went with.  

In this environment of low interest rates, CRP

as part of your portfolio has been quite attractive.

Also, many use this land for hunting in the fall and

it tends to be a nice tax deductable recreational

trip to check on the CRP each year. 

In Mato Grosso and elsewhere, we have 3 tiers of

reserve requirements for land. 

20% reserve 80% open  Cerrado

35% reserve 65% open  Cerrado

50/50  forest areas and Mato Grosso law

80% reserve 20% open new forest code north of 13 deg S lat

There has been talk about paying land owners on their reserve

area to preserve it -try to disincentivize its deforesation. 

On paper this would work. It would take a big fund.

It also would take a FSA office type agency in each

county to oversee. 

In the short term, it would throttle back expansion.

However, in the long term, I think the program would

follow the evolution of the CRP program in the USA.

They mean well in the beginning.

But once consolidation of large blocks or groups of

farms start being bought out by investment funds

just for the revenue stream, one might regret what it

looks like after 10 or 20 years of investment bankers

calculating current present value of a 30 or 50 year

Brazilian CRP contract.  In a negative interest

environment, the land values would explode off the charts.

So I repeat, Bill Maher, Amazon is not for sale. 

I will close with a bit of irony and maybe a bit

of a paradox for some.

You know what is saving the Amazon today?

ASF

yes, African Swine Fever in China.

If it were not for this disease and China's animal

rations dropping by 10 to 15 million tons, we would have

had a hell of a lot more smoke in the Amazon this year.

China is a major factor as to how this all unfolds in

coming years. 

As I stated at the beginning; CALM DOWN

"You need to calm down, you're being too loud
And I'm just like oh-oh, oh-oh, oh-oh, oh-oh, oh-oh (oh)
You need to just stop"

I am happy to discuss this, but I do charge for my service.

The rate is US$ 500 per hour.

No exceptions for journalists. 

Go to my website and push some buttons if you

want to talk. 

Have a great week.

I can't wait for the rainy season to start in 3 weeks.

Kory

July 15 Looking ahead to 2020

Corn harvest is zipping along. Mato Grosso planted
a record area and also a record yield this year - 31 mmt is
the forecast.

One corn ethanol mill is running at full throttle and
pumping out 1.5 million liters per day from corn.

Two more will fire up in coming months. Sinop
in August and Sorriso by Feb 1, 2020.

The Nova Mutum mill project is on hold at moment.
Mato Grosso is pondering the elimination of ethanol
tax incentives within the sate. This is a silly move on their
part, but we will know the status by July 31. The incentives
need to be extended by then. I think they will find an alternative
to this, if they do not, that will choke off the corn ethanol expansion
within the state.

With the late planting and potential crop losses in USA, corn
prices have been quit firm the past month. Many farmers are
selling  2020 crop too.

Conab finished out the soybean crop at 115 mmt. Private
forecasts and USDA are at 117-118 for this past year.
I said back in late Janaury, I expect to drop to 115 and
then stand pat. Given the dry weather at the time, I dropped
to 114. Many others were thinking  101 to 108 to 110.
Given a crop size potential in the 123 to 125 mmt at the time,
we need to becareful with these lowball numbers. Rule of
thumb is that when a region of Brazil is going through
a crop loss, it is difficult to lose more than 10 mmt in any
given year. Another region tends to compensate and that
is what happened this year. RGDS came in at  19 mmt.
Who wudda thunk?  Impressive gains from previous
drought where they only produced  6.8 mmt.

If corn prices start to rock and roll in the coming weeks,
it is the southern states that can reverse trend and switch
from soy to 1st crop corn. The July newsletter outlined
that potential.

Land clearing and expansion is occuring in northern
Mato Grosso. It is legal. 20% of a given area is being
opened. 1st crop tends to be rice.

Pension reform is moving right along. Brazil stock market
is at record highs and FX is back to 3.75 after trading
4.10:1 not too long ago.

BR 163 is looking good. The tough spot where trucks
have been spinning out upon a long incline has been
paved. Soybeans will move smoothly to the north
this wet season in February 2020. I doubt we will
see videos of stuck trucks again.(at least not along
BR 163)

Lots of talk about  railroads and extensions.
All of this has been talked about in newsletters.

The 1st half of 2019 has been a flop for Brazil
economy; (.8% growth in GDP). If not for ag,
Brazil would be going backwards.
The 2nd half of 2019 should show some growth.
Good machine sales and closed financing contracts
combined with factory orders.

I keep hearing reports that the limit on land that
can be owned by foreigners will be overturned
yet this year.

Some land sales have been confirmed in Mato Grosso.
Turn key farms and also forest and land clearing
projects.

Pork sales have been brisk to Russia and China
in June.

I have received a 420 page report that outlines the
future production potentials of crops and volumes
to be moved by road, rail and water.
It is in Portuguese. I will use snipets of this
document in future newsletters.

Upward and onward.

good luck with harvest
Kory

Keywords:
soy crop size, corn harvest, corn ethanol, Brazil econ,
new land clearing and future production and shipping volumes.

The Soybean Wars

May 21 Blog update:

In my July 2018 newsletter, I asked the question: Is it possible
that soybeans are the wheat of the 80s?

With the USDA announcement today of US$ 2 dollar
per bushel soybean payments, I think I have my answer.
For the government to announce something like this
during planting season is mind blowing. Many areas plant
soybeans until July- especially the double crop areas.

We have a situation where the market is telling the world
to back off 10 million acres or 15 million tons.
With a US$ 2.00 payment to USA farmer, that tells
them to put the pedal to the floor. It does not matter
if payments are decoupled and they use past history.
If payments are coming, the farmer will plant.

I think back to the 80s. I am a product of deficiency payments,
CRP, and grain storage programs.
I remember needing every penny we could get from USDA and
then along comes Gramm/Rudman and knocks 15% off our
checks in 1985. We need to balance the budget was the matra.

In the 90s we got paid on 85% of our base acres.

We put 36 million acres into CRP and in the 2000's
Brazil, Argentina and others add 36 million acres and
more to the world stage with the help of double crop acres too.

The national debt at the time was 5 Trillion. Today, it is damn near
22 Trillion dollars. Today, we receive notice that 20 billion more can
come in assistance. God, how we could have used that back in the
80s and 90s instead of fight for crumbs.

The irony of all of this is that if the USDA had the will power back in
the 80s to send out money like this and a reduced CRP program,
the USA could have bankrupted the Brazilian/Mato Grosso soybean
farmer before he had a chance to start.

By the time 18 dollar beans came along, the environmental oversight
would have nipped expansion in the bud -20% to 30% open instead of
80% in areas.

Today, I fear it is too late. If Washington thinks they are going to
break the Brazilian farmer- think again.
Today, Brazil enters the Real Trade war. This is now a fight
to the death. This is now a blood sport.

The trade war creates a strong dollar scenario and that only
entices them more down here. Soybeans are sold in dollars.

Brazil's infrastructure gets a little bit better each year. China is ready
to invest more into Brazil. The FX at 4:1 protects the Brazilian farmer
for the time being.

The Brazil farmer has said for over 10 years, "pay us something for
our reserve area and we will leave it alone." The 50%-80% that
new areas need left alone.

I sometimes wonder if it might have been cheaper for USA and the World
to have paid the Brazilian farmer an Amazon CRP payment of sorts to do
nothing with the frontier area, than to pay the USA farmer not to plant
highly erodible soils and wetlands.

With today's announcement, we will now find out who the low
cost producer is? How many 250,000 dollar planters do we need
to plant US$ 4 dollar soybeans in North Dakota?

Someone needs to blink, but 2019 is not the year. Unless we can freeze
these beans in Sept and knock 500 million bushel off, we have a paradigm
shift ahead with regards to soybeans as signifcant as Round UP ready
technology was to corn and beans- only in reverse.

How many years will soybeans be stored if the government payments
keep coming?

As my Brazilian friends have always said, you guys will be OK,
you guys have the Federal Reserve. You will just print more money.
It is no wonder Brasilians and others think dollars grow on trees.
Just go get some more. It is easy for you guys.

This is going to create more and more hard feelings between
hemispheres now. In 2018 Brazil and ARG could enjoy the
trade war and profit from it.

With MEGA government payments in phase II, now the bleeding
begins?  Who is first?


Kory

Keywords: Soybean history, government payments, trade war,
low cost producer, FX

April 20th blog update

It seems like most private crop forecasters have the

BR soybean crop at 115-118 mmt.

This is a marked increase since February.

Most everyone was in the 111-114 mmt club.

Aprosoja was the outliar saying the crop could

be as small as 101 mmt. 

I think it is worth noting how significant RGDS is in

soybean production. With the losses in Parana, RGDS is

the 2nd largest soy producer behind Mato Grosso at 18.7 mmt.

If we look back to the previous major drought for the southern

states, that was 2011-2012 crop year. RGDS came in at 6.5 mmt.

It was bad. Since then, acreage shift away from corn, rice and

productivity gains have allowed RGDS to rebound to near 19 mmt.

This is + 300% from their low point. This has nothing to do

with deforestation or expansion in the northern areas. This is simply

good farmers doing their best. 

We can look at 2018-19 crop year two ways. If this crop is at 

115 mmt+, then last year's crop was greatly understated. If we assume

8-10 mmt were lost from peak potential, that means last year was

a 123 mmt+ crop size and this year we had 125 mmt at one time. 

The flip side is: If last year's crop was 120 mmt, then this year's crop

size is too high and we need to look at Conab's numbers at 113.8 mmt

as being more accurate. 

Ths USDA at 117 mmt and the Brazil FAS office at 113.6 mmt is very

confusing. Does the left hand know what the right hand is doing?

Going into 2020, it sure looks like we can pencil in 125 mmt for a 

starting point for next year's crop. This is not what the USA farmer

wants to hear and the Brazilian farmer needs to grasp that there

are too many beans in the world. The trade war now has everyone

on equal terms. The 2018 BR windfall is over. That was a once in a 

lifetime illusion. March 2020 soybean premiums are only 8 cents

over CME. 

China now has North and South America by the short hairs. 

At the moment, FX is helping the Brazilian soy and corn farmer.

FX is helping them maintain profitability. 

The 2nd crop corn in Brazil will be beyond fantastic. 75 mmt + 25 mmt

for 1st crop should allow for a total corn crop output of 100 mmt+.

FS bioenergy has announced the site for their 3rd corn ethanol mill.

The plan is for two more- right place at right time.
The first mill is pumping out 1.5 million liters per day of ethanol +
DDG's. 

There is talk of a truckers strike starting April 29th. Contacts tell me

it is just a few on social media stirring the pot. Nothing will happen. We will see.

Brazil cannot handle another shutdown like last year. 

The new admin is between a rock and a hard place. They encouraged

the truckers last year as it was a political windfall for them to have this happen.

Now, the shoe is on other foot. Crude oil keeps rising and FX is near 4:1.

This was not in the plan back in January. This puts pressure on Petrobras

to keep increasing fuel prices every two weeks and this is squeezing the

truckers again. Soy sales have been slow, so there have been trucks hauling

freight for below the minimum price table. This table is still being reviewed

for its constitutionality. 

The new admin wants to privatize Petrobras, but just last week the govt

intervened and asked Petrobras to delay a fuel price increase as per fear of

a truckers strike. They cannot have it both ways.

The FX market looks at these shenanigans with fear that the govt will also

fold their hand with regards to pension reform. Thus, we are hugging

4:1 again, which was not forecasted by anyone in January. We should

be trading at 3.30- 3.50:1 given the optimism at the beginning of the

year. Therefore, Brazil GDP forecast has now been lowered to 1.8% for

the year. 

I have heard that Representative Collin Peterson from MN, who is also the

Ag committee chairman, will be coming to Brazil and Argentina soon

on a fact finding mission to see how the trade war has affected and/or

stimulated other countries at the expense of the American farmer. 

How is China helping AR and BR with infrastructure?

I am happy to hear they are coming. I feel they are 20 years too late.

Given some of the projections I have seen for Brazil's production

by 2025 and 2050, we need not be producing soybeans north of I-94

in the USA. 

Climate change, resurgence in Chinese soy demand post ASF, FX

distorting and incentivizing production, and railroad expansion will

all play into Brazil's hand in the coming years. 

I mentioned this to clients several years ago as China evolves

in her food needs. I said, what if China can't get soybeans fast enough

because of factor X?  Maybe they decide to buy Brazil Foods, turbo-charge

chicken and pork production within Brazil, keep the beans here, crush and

make into feed here, and then just ship the end product to China?

If ASF would last a number of years?  Is the above such a crazy idea?
Of course this would be a boon for livestock producers around the world

as China searches for protein in the mean time.

If something like that were to happen, think of how that changes Brazil's

logistics needs?  We flip from huge bulk grain volumes at ports to 

refrigerated warehouses storing meat in containers. We would need

more soy crushers and more corn ethanol mills. DDG's would be in

high demand. Huge increase in Brazil soy and corn storage capacity to

hold grains year around for processing. Could that be Brazil's future

by 2050?  Damn right it could be, maybe even by 2030 if a renewed

search for protein ensues. 

Thank you for all the newsletter renewals and VIP retainers.

I have been doing this for over 15 years now.

I am not sure where the time has gone.
My son is taking Brazil college exams and also the USA SAT is
given 4X per year here in Goiania. Who wudda thunk? 

The more Brazil trys to change- the more she stays the same

i.e. Petrobras and fuel pricing drama.

For those outside South America, one needs to watch the ARG election

in Oct. It will be important that Macri wins again. If ARG would go LEFT,

combined with weak FX in Uraguay and Venezuela problems, that would

be a stiff head wind for Brazil to tolerate going forward. It would lead to

a weaker REAL. 

Regards

Kory

Keywords:  BR soy and corn, corn ethanol, trucker strike, FX, 

protein shift dynamic long term, USA Ag committee junket to BR and ARG, Trade war,
ARG election Oct 2019